Our Vision

Competitive Regurgitators vs. Collaborative Innovators

A kid named Jamal was helping me set up a room for panelists. He kept asking specific questions about how I wanted it done. I finally said, “What do you think?” He paused, seemed taken aback and said, “No one has ever asked me that before”. Jamal was a senior in high school.

Sir Ken Robinson argues that schools kill creativity. The Foundation for Critical Thinking uses the analogy that we teach in a “mother robin” fashion by mentally chewing up everything for our students and putting it into their intellectual beaks to swallow.

Meanwhile, global challenges will require a level of collaboration and innovation unlike anything we’ve experienced. Many teachers we’ve worked with are very uncomfortable with group grades or measurements of students’ participation in a group project. Many compromise and say, “Ok, but after the project grade I will give them a multiple choice test just so I can be sure that each student has learned the material (read: remember what I told them to remember).”

How would school be different if we intentionally moved away from fostering competitive regurgitation to collaborative innovation?

3 thoughts on “Competitive Regurgitators vs. Collaborative Innovators”

  1. I like the idea of collaborative models mostly because that is far more similar to what most professions demand of its workers.
    I think it can be done (at least for now) in conjunction with typical assessment. My civics co-teacher is doing at least one cooperative pairing for each standard. It’s going exceptionally well. Of her six classes, my co-teacher reports that our class (which has students with disabilities, English Language learners, and typical learners altogether) works best under the cooperative model. I too have been so impressed with what they can create and how the content is absorbed.

  2. Thanks for your thoughts, Hannah. Good to hear a real live example of what the research supports: most students learn better in groups. Ken Robinson’s video (we posted yesterday) says “collaboration is the stuff of growth” and ed researcher Robert Marzono has meta-analysis to support its incredible effect size on learning outcomes (we love The Art and Science of Teaching by Marzano).

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s